Clinician Collaboration Appendix
A medically cautious, patient-responsibility framework
This appendix exists to support collaboration with licensed clinicians. It does not replace clinical judgment.
Principles
- Medication can be lifesaving. The objective is not “anti-medicine.”
- The objective is risk reduction, informed consent, and functional improvement.
- Holistic interventions here are designed to be low-risk, food-first, and scalable.
What this project is
- A structured, zone-aware repository of food-first practices, herbs, and topical supports
- A way for patients to improve consistency (nutrition, movement, sleep), which often improves outcomes
What this project is not
- Not a directive to deprescribe
- Not a replacement for evidence-based diagnosis or treatment
- Not a substitute for monitoring, labs, or clinical follow-up
Safety guardrails (recommended)
- Medication changes only under clinician supervision
- Document baseline symptoms and functional status
- Start interventions one at a time to reduce confounding
- Avoid high-dose extracts; prioritize whole-food and topical approaches
- Screen for interactions (examples):
- St. John’s Wort: multi-drug interactions
- Concentrated essential oils: skin sensitization risk
- Anticoagulants: caution with certain supplements (verify individually)
Collaboration workflow (suggested)
- Patient identifies goal: pain, sleep, stress, inflammation
- Clinician screens red flags and contraindications
- Patient implements low-risk routine for 2–4 weeks
- Reassess: function, sleep, pain score, side effects, adherence
- Only then consider medication optimization
Faith Frontier stance
We support informed consent, accountability, and stewardship of health as a moral responsibility. We do not attribute illness to moral failure, nor do we replace clinical care with ideology.